Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK FAWCETT, Case No. 1:24-cv-00382-SAB-HC

Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

v. FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST STATE

REMEDIES

WARDEN,

Respondent.

14 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases requires preliminary review of a habeas petition and allows a district court to dismiss a petition before the respondent is ordered to file a response, if it “plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. On April 2, 2024, the Court received the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus wherein Petitioner challenges his convictions in Merced County Superior Court Case No. 18CR- 02358. (ECF No. 1.) Although unclear,…