(HC)Saldivar

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 RUSTY LEE SALDIVAR, Case No. 1:24-cv-00393-SAB-HC

12 Petitioner,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

13 v. PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST STATE

14 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COURT REMEDIES

FRESNO COUNTY,

15 Respondent. 16 17 18 Petitioner is a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 19 challenging the superior court’s bail determination and Petitioner’s continued pretrial detention. 20 Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases1 requires preliminary review of a 21 habeas petition and allows a district court to dismiss a petition before the respondent is ordered 22 to file a response, if it “plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the 23 petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 24 Cases in the United States District Courts, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. 25 Habeas petitions are subject to an exhaustion requirement—either a judicially-created 26 prudential one under 28…