Amaral

Amaral v. Beloglovsky

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20242:23-cv-02378California5,346 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LACEY AMARAL, No. 2:23-cv-02378-DAD-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S

14 MIRIAM BELOGLOVSKY, et al., COMPLAINT AND GRANTING IN PART

LEAVE TO AMEND

15 Defendants. (Doc. No. 9) 16

17 18 This matter came before the court on February 6, 2024 for a hearing on a motion to 19 dismiss plaintiff’s complaint filed by defendants Miriam Beloglovsky, Los Rios Community 20 College District, and Consumnes River College on November 22, 2023. (Doc. No. 9.) Attorney 21 James Arrasmith appeared by video on behalf of plaintiff Lacey Amaral and attorney Kellie 22 Murphy appeared by video on behalf of defendants. (Doc. No. 18.) For the reasons explained 23 below, defendants’ motion to dismiss will be granted. Plaintiff will be granted leave to amend as 24 to certain of her claims. 25 BACKGROUND 26 Plaintiff filed her operative complaint initiating this action on August 22, 2023 in the 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.