Unknown

(PC) Joseph v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20242:23-cv-02932California333 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ALONZO JAMES JOSEPH, Case No. 2:23-cv-2932-TLN-JDP 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER 13 UNKNOWN, 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 18 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On March 14, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 21 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 7.) The time to 22 file objections has passed, and Plaintiff did not file any objections. 23 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 24 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 25 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.