Warden
(PC) Price v. Warden
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT RICHARD PRICE, No. 2:23-cv-01229 DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS WARDEN, Defendant. 16 By order filed January 8, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign this action to a United States District Judge. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections //// //// with…