Benavidez

(PC) Latten v. Benavidez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20242:23-cv-01879California2,635 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM ANGELO LATTEN, JR., No. 2:23-cv-1879 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. BENAVIDEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Before the court is plaintiff’s complaint for screening and his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons set forth below, this court will grant the motion to proceed in forma pauperis. In addition, this court finds plaintiff has stated potentially cognizable Eighth Amendment claims for excessive force against defendants Salinas-Gonzalez and Ortiz-Garcia and a potentially cognizable Eighth Amendment claim for failure to protect against defendant Warstler. This court further finds plaintiff fails to state any claims against defendant Benavidez. Plaintiff will be given the choice of filing an amended complaint or proceeding immediately on the claims in his complaint against Salinas-Gonzalez, Ortiz-Garcia, and Warstler.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.