Bugge
(PC) Brown v. Bugge
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK ANTHONY BROWN, No. 2:22-cv-2118 CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &
RECOMMENDATIONS
14 B. BUGGE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel with a civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 11, 2024, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. 19 Plaintiff did not file an opposition. On June 29, 2023, the court advised plaintiff of the 20 requirements for opposing a motion pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 21 See Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc); Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 22 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 1988). On January 11, 2024, by contemporaneous notice, defendants 23 provided plaintiff with the required Rand notice. (ECF No. 29-3.) 24 On February 13, 2024, plaintiff was ordered to file an opposition or a statement of non- 25 opposition to the pending motion within thirty days. (ECF No. 32) In that same order,…