Samul

(HC) Dennis v. Samul

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20242:21-cv-01906California7,337 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT K. DENNIS, No. 2:21-CV-1906-DJC-DMC-P Petitioner,

v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS D. SAMUL, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court are Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, Respondent’s answer, ECF No. 20, and Petitioner’s reply, ECF No. 22. Respondent has lodged relevant state court records, ECF No. 26. Because this action was filed after April 26, 1996, the provisions of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”) are presumptively applicable. See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. 320, 336 (1997); Calderon v. United States Dist. Ct. (Beeler), 128 F.3d 1283, 1287 (9th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1099 (1998). Under AEDPA, federal habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) is not available for any claim decided on the merits in /…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.