Baltimore Aircoil Company, Inc. v. Solitaire Overseas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 12, 20241:22-cv-00952California4,848 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 BALTIMORE AIRCOIL COMPANY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00952-KES-BAM

INC.,

11 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Plaintiff, REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S 12 APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST 13 DEFENDANT SOLITAIRE OVERSEAS

SOLITAIRE OVERSEAS,

14 (Doc. 23) Defendant. 15 FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Baltimore Aircoil Company, Inc.’s 18 application for entry of default judgment against Defendant Solitaire Overseas filed on November 19 17, 2023, and as amended on January 4, 2024. (Docs. 23, 28.) The motion was referred to the 20 undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Defendant did not file a 21 timely opposition to the motion.1 L.R. 230(c). The matter is deemed submitted. L.R. 230(g). 22 Having considered the application, as amended on January 4, 2024, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.