Doe

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MARIA DOE, a fictitious name; CLARA No. 2:21-cv-01438-MCE-CKD DOE, a fictitious name, and “I.D.,” a 11 fictitious name, by and through her next friend, MARIA DOE, 12 ORDER Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO;

15 SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S

OFFICE; DARRYL RODERICK;

16 JAGDEEP SINGH, individually and as administrator of the Estate of Sushma 17 Giri; V & N ASSOCIATES, LLC; and

ALIDA ESTRADA,

18 Defendants. 19 20 By way of the present action, Plaintiffs seek to recover from various Defendants, 21 including the County of Sacramento (“County”), for injuries sustained when she and her 22 children were purportedly coerced to leave their apartment by a Sheriff’s Deputy without 23 legal process or an interpreter. Presently before the Court is the County’s Motion for 24 Reconsideration (ECF No. 74) of the Magistrate Judge’s order granting Plaintiffs’ Motion 25 to Compel (ECF No. 72) requiring the County to produce over 50,000 CAD reports or to 26 allow Plaintiffs’ expert to access the system to conduct…