(PC) Younger v. Officer Alvarez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 12, 20241:24-cv-00098California1,672 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRANDI ADRIENNE YOUNGER, No. 1:24-cv-00098-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

13 v. TO THIS ACTION 14 ALVAREZ, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

15 Defendants. CERTAIN CLAIM AND DEFENDANT H.

ARREOLA

16 (ECF No. 10) 17

18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 19

U.S.C. § 1983.

20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed April 2, 2024. 21 I. 22

SCREENING REQUIREMENT

23 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 24 governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The 25 Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally 26 “frivolous or malicious,” that “fail[] to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or that 27 “seek[] monetary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.