Faria
Faria v. PNC Bank National Assoc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL A. FARIA, et al., No. 2:23-cv-02023-DAD-CSK 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST
14 PNC BANK NATIONAL AMENDED COMPLAINT AND CLOSING ASSOCIATION, et al., THIS CASE 15 Defendants. (Doc. No. 27) 16 17 This matter is before the court on defendant SN Servicing Corporation’s motion to dismiss 18 plaintiffs’ first amended complaint. (Doc. No. 27.) On January 8, 2024, the pending motion was 19 taken under submission to be decided on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. 20 No. 28.) For the reasons explained below, the court will grant defendant’s motion to dismiss. 21 BACKGROUND 22 On September 18, 2013, plaintiffs filed their original complaint against defendants PNC 23 Bank, National Association (“PNC Bank”), a mortgage lender, and SN Servicing Corporation 24 (“SN Servicing”), a mortgage servicer, seeking a temporary restraining order deferring a trustee 25 …