Taylor

(PC) Aguilar v. Taylor

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20241:23-cv-01512California5,062 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDGAR AGUILAR, Case No. 1:23-cv-01512-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN TO A

DISTRICT JUDGE

13 v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

14 CDCR, FERNANDO ALVAREZ, and PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO PROCEED ON

BRIAN TAYLOR, COGNIZABLE CLAIM AND DISMISS

15 REMAINING CLAIMS1 Defendants. 16 (Doc. No. 12) 17 14-DAY DEADLINE

18 19 Plaintiff Edgar Aguilar is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 20 civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff proceeds on his Second Amended Complaint. 21 (Doc. No. 12, “SAC”). As more fully set forth below, the undersigned finds the SAC states 22 claims for Eighth Amendment deliberate medical indifference and a state law claim for 23 intentional infliction of emotional distress against Defendant Taylor but fails to state any other 24 cognizable claims against the California Department of Corrections and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.