Biden
(HC) Littleton v. Biden
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL LITTLETON, No. 2:24-cv-0449 AC P Petitioner,
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
v. RECOMMENDATIONS JOE BIDEN, Respondent. 16 By an order filed February 27, 2024, petitioner was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis application or pay the filing fee and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 3. The thirty-day period has now expired, and petitioner has not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, paid the filing fee, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Although it appears from the file that petitioner’s copy of the order was returned, petitioner was properly served. It is the petitioner’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY…