Escobedo

Escobedo v. Jensen & Pilegard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20241:24-cv-00088California143 words

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE ESCOBEDO, No. 1:24-cv-00088-KES-SKO

12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF

COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE

14 JENSEN & PILEGARD, et al., (Doc. 16) 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 On April 12, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. 19 (Doc. 16.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been 21 dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 22

23 IT IS SO ORDERED.

24 Dated: April 15, 2024 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28