Warden
(HC) Fiorito v. Warden
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL FIORITO, No. 2:23-cv-3054 WBS AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 WARDEN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a habeas corpus petition filed 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On February 9, 2024, respondent filed a motion to dismiss the 19 petition. ECF No. 7. On March 18, 2024, petitioner was ordered to file and serve, within twenty- 20 one days, an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the pending motion. ECF No. 8. In the 21 same order, petitioner was informed that failure to file an opposition would result in a 22 recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant 23 to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Id. The twenty-one-day period has now expired, and 24 petitioner has not filed a response to the motion or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 25 For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action…