Puckett
Puckett v. County of Sacramento
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 JEREMY PHILLIP PUCKETT, No. 2:22-cv-0350 KJM DB 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. ORDER 15 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 On March 22, 2024, plaintiff filed a motion to compel and noticed the motion for hearing 19 before the undersigned on April 12, 2024, pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1). (ECF No. 122.) On 20 March 29, 2024, plaintiff filed a motion to compel and noticed that motion for hearing on April 21 19, 2023. (ECF No. 139.) That same day, the parties filed a Joint Statement re: Discovery 22 Disagreement in connection to the motion set for hearing on April 12, 2024. (ECF No. 140.) 23 On April 5, 2024, the parties filed a Joint Statement in connection with the motion set for 24 hearing on April 19, 2024. (ECF No. 152.) At 3:42 p.m. on April 11, 2024—the day before the 25 April 12, 2024 hearing—defense counsel filed a document styled “Declaration . . . in Support of 26 Joint Statement Regarding 30(b)(6) Witnesses.” (ECF No. 159.) 27 …