Puckett
Puckett v. County of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JEREMY PHILLIP PUCKETT, No. 2:22-cv-0350 KJM DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 17 On March 22, 2024, plaintiff filed a motion to compel and noticed the motion for hearing before the undersigned on April 12, 2024, pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1). (ECF No. 122.) On March 29, 2024, plaintiff filed a motion to compel and noticed that motion for hearing on April 19, 2023. (ECF No. 139.) That same day, the parties filed a Joint Statement re: Discovery Disagreement in connection to the motion set for hearing on April 12, 2024. (ECF No. 140.) On April 5, 2024, the parties filed a Joint Statement in connection with the motion set for hearing on April 19, 2024. (ECF No. 152.) At 3:42 p.m. on April 11, 2024—the day before the April 12, 2024 hearing—defense counsel filed a document styled “Declaration . . . in Support of Joint Statement Regarding 30(b)(6) Witnesses.” (ECF No. 159.) …