Macomber

(PC) Snow v. Macomber

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 16, 20242:23-cv-02117California556 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEPHEN F. SNOW, No. 2:23-cv-02117-KJM-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER JEFF MACOMBER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prison inmate, proceeds without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On December 19, 2023, the magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s complaint in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. ECF No. 7. The magistrate judge dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim and granted plaintiff thirty days in which to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies. Id. The time for acting has now passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Instead, he has filed objections to the screening order, which the court construes as a motion for reconsideration. A district judge may consider timely requests to “modify or set aside any part of the [magistrate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.