Rose
Rose v. City of Suisun City
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NICKOLAS G. ROSE, No. 2:21-cv-02214-DAD-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE
CITY OF SUISIN CITY, et al., PLEADINGS Defendants. (Doc. No. 35) 16 17 This matter is before the court on the motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by defendants Amtrak and Union Pacific Railroad Company (the “railroad defendants”) on October 31, 2023. (Doc. No. 35.) On November 13, 2023, this motion was taken under submission on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. No. 36.) For the reasons explained below, the court will grant the motion for judgment on the pleadings and enter judgment in the railroad defendants’ favor. BACKGROUND On September 3, 2021, plaintiff Nickolas G. Rose filed a complaint in the Solano County Superior Court initiating this tort lawsuit against defendants Suisun City, Amtrak, and unnamed Doe defendants 1–10. (Doc. No. 1…