Oguntuase

(PC) Kendrid v. Oguntuase

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 16, 20242:21-cv-01558California1,407 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FORREST KENDRID, Case No. 2:21-cv-01558-WBS-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR THE

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND

14 E. OGUNTUASE, MOTION TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING

ORDER

15 Defendant. ECF Nos. 53 & 54 16

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

17

THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND

18 BE DENIED 19 ECF No. 54 20 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

21 22 Plaintiff, a civil detainee proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. 23 § 1983. Plaintiff has filed two motions; the first seeks the appointment of counsel and 24 reconsideration of my prior order denying counsel, and the second seeks to amend the complaint 25 and to modify the scheduling order. ECF Nos. 53 & 54. Defendant has filed an opposition to 26 only plaintiff’s second motion. ECF No. 55. For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s first…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.