Oguntuase

(PC) Kendrid v. Oguntuase

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 16, 20242:21-cv-01558California1,407 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FORREST KENDRID, Case No. 2:21-cv-01558-WBS-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR THE

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND

E. OGUNTUASE, MOTION TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING

ORDER

Defendant. ECF Nos. 53 & 54

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND

BE DENIED ECF No. 54 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

21 Plaintiff, a civil detainee proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed two motions; the first seeks the appointment of counsel and reconsideration of my prior order denying counsel, and the second seeks to amend the complaint and to modify the scheduling order. ECF Nos. 53 & 54. Defendant has filed an opposition to only plaintiff’s second motion. ECF No. 55. For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s first…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.