Blink

Blink v. Kern High School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20241:23-cv-00531California1,776 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3

4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 M.H., by and through his guardian ad litem Case No. 1:23-cv-00531-KES-CDB TIFFANY ARTERBERRY, et al., 12 ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION Plaintiffs, OF NA’SHAUN L. NEAL, PETER LAURENCE 13 CARR, IV, AND LAUREN KHALI MCRAE TO v. WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS 14 KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., (Doc. 42) 15 16 Defendants. 21-DAY DEADLINE

17 Clerk of the Court to Effect Service By Mail

18

19 Pending before the Court is the ex-parte motion of Lauren K. McRae on behalf of herself, Peter

20 L. Carr, IV, and Na’Shaun L. Neal, of PLC Law Group, A PC (“PLCLG”) to withdraw as Plaintiffs’ 21 counsel of record. (Doc. 42). The PLCLG attorneys’ motion is supported by a declaration of attorney 22 McRae (Doc. 42-1) and a sealed filing, which was reviewed by the Court. (Doc. 50). The Court 23 convened for an in-person and Zoom videoconference hearing on the motion on April 8, 2024. (Doc. 24 52). Counsel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.