Unknown

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JESSE SALVADOR SOLIS, No. 2:23-cv-00247 DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 UNKNOWN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants violated his due process rights by providing him 19 with in adequate dental care. (ECF No. 14 at 5.) Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion 20 to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 15) and his second amended complaint (ECF No. 14) for 21 screening. For the reasons set forth below, the court will deny the motion to proceed in forma 22 pauperis as Moot and that the complaint be dismissed with leave to amend. 23 IN FORMA PAUPERIS 24 On April 5, 2023, the undersigned granted plaintiff’s motion to procced in forma pauperis. 25 (ECF No. 7.) Therefore, undersigned will deny plaintiff’s additional motion to proceed in forma 26 pauperis (ECF No. 15) as moot. 27 //// 28 //// 1 …