(PC)Roberson

(PC)Roberson v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 16, 20241:22-cv-00833California335 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MORRIS ROBERSON, No. 1:22-cv-00833-JLT-SAB (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER TERMINATING ACTION

PURSUANT TO PARTIES’ STIPULATION

12 v. FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 13 CDCR, et al., (ECF No. 50) 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff Morris Roberson is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 17 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 On April 15, 2024, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice 19 pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as the case has been 20 resolved in its entirety. (ECF No. 50.) 21 Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides in pertinent part that, “the plaintiff may dismiss an action 22 without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have 23 appeared. A voluntary stipulation to dismiss an action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 24 automatically terminates the action without operation of a court order.” Black Rock…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.