Heslop

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEENAN WILKINS, No. 2:20-cv-01622 DJC DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND S. HESLOP, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se with claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for excessive force, retaliation, and violations of due process and equal protection. Plaintiff also asserts state law claims. Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery, motion to modify the scheduling order, motion for leave to amend, and request for judicial notice are before the court. (ECF Nos. 39, 43, 45, and 50.) For the reasons set forth below, plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery and request for judicial notice are denied. Plaintiff’s motion to modify the scheduling order is granted in part, as set forth below. The undersigned recommends the motion for leave to amend be denied. I. Background and Plaintiff’s Allegations Plaintiff filed this action in the San Joaquin County Superior…