Bola

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARREN GILBERT, No. 1:22-cv-01286-KJM-KJN 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 MAMTA BOLA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. 19 § 636(b)(1)(B), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72 and Local Rule 302(c)(19). On November 20, 20 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties 21 and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be 22 filed within fourteen (14) days. That period has passed, and the parties have not filed objections. 23 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 24 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 25 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 26 by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] 27 …