(BK) In Re: Gregory Schmidt
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 In Re GREGORY SCHMIDT, District Case No. 2:23-cv-00233-DJC 11 Debtors. Bankr. Case No. 20-25614-A-7 12 GREGORY SCHMIDT, Bankr. Adversary Case No. 21-02018-A 13 Appellant, 14 v. ORDER 15
SPENCER T. MALYSIAK PROFIT
16 SHARING PLAN,
17 Appellee.
18
19
20 Appellant Gregory Schmidt has filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the
21 Court’s prior order denying his appeal of the Bankruptcy Court’s order and
22 judgment.1 Appe llant argues that “[the Court’s] holding is illogical and not probable” 23 and that the elements required for a debt to be excepted from discharge under 11 24 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2) were not met. 25 26 1 While stated to be a “Motion to Reconsider Rule 60(b)(1)”, as the Court is sitting in its capacity as the 27 court of appeal from the Bankruptcy Court’s decision, the motion is construed to be intended as a Motion for Rehearing under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8022. For simplicity, the Court will 28 continue to refer to it as…