Puckett

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JEREMY PHILLIP PUCKETT, No. 2:22-cv-0350 KJM DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 17 On March 1, 2024, plaintiff filed a motion to compel. (ECF No. 97.) On March 22, 2024, the parties filed a Joint Statement re: Discovery Disagreement. (ECF No. 126.) Pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1) this matter came before the undersigned on April 5, 2024, for hearing of plaintiff’s motion to compel. (ECF No. 151.) Attorney Ryan Snyder appeared on behalf of plaintiff, who was also present. Attorney John Whitefleet appeared on behalf of defendants. After hearing oral argument, plaintiff’s motion was taken under submission. I. Background “A complaint guides the parties’ discovery[.]” Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co., 232 F.3d 1271, 1292 (9th Cir. 2000). As explained by the assigned District Judge, the complaint alleges that plaintiff was incarcerated based on convictions for robbery and murder for…