Schuyler
(HC) Pink v. Schuyler
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DVONTAE LARONE PINK, No. 1:24-cv-00449-SKO (HC) Petitioner, ORDER REQUIRING PETITITONER TO
SUBMIT SIGNED DECLARATION
v. [TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE] CHARLES SCHUYLER, Acting Warden, Respondent. 16 On April 15, 2024, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Upon a close examination of the petition submitted to the Court, the Court has discovered that the petition does not contain an original signature. Petitioner will be granted an opportunity to cure this deficiency. DISCUSSION I. Preliminary Review of Petition Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases requires the Court to make a preliminary review of each petition for writ of habeas corpus. The Court must dismiss a petition "[i]f it plainly appears from the petition . . . that the petitioner is not entitled to relief." Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; see also Hendricks v. Vasquez, 908 F.2d 490, 491 (9th Cir. 1990). A…