CA Open Lands v. Butte County Dept. of Public Works

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 17, 20242:20-cv-00123California10,020 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

10 CALIFORNIA OPEN LANDS, No. 2:20-cv-00123-DJC-DMC

11 Plaintiff, v.

12 ORDER

BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF

13 PUBLIC WORKS, DENNIS SCHMIDT, and ERIC MILLER,

14 Defendants.

15

16

17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff California Open Lands’ Motion for Partial

18 Summary Judgment on its first, third, and fourth claims for relief. (ECF No. 91.)

19 Having considered the Parties’ briefing and arguments, the Court hereby

20 GRANTS the Motion in part, and DENIES it in part.

21 FACTUAL BACKGROUND

22 I. Plaintiff’ s Wetland Preserve 23 Plaintiff is a California non-profit land trust corporation based in Chico, 24 California. (Nielsen Decl. (ECF No. 91-5) ¶ 1.) In 2007, Butte County recorded a 25 perpetual conservation easement grant (“Easement”) in Plaintiff’s favor that created a 26 wetland preserve (“Preserve”) on a portion of the Neal Road Recycling and Waste 27 Facility (“Facility”) located in Butte County. (Id. ¶ 2.) Plaintiff maintains the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.