Romero

(PC) DeJesus v. Romero

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 17, 20241:23-cv-01096California7,970 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

10 JOE S. DEJESUS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01096-KES-EPG (PC)

11 Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING PREVIOUS

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

12 v. (ECF NO. 17) 13 J. ROMERO et al.,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

14 Defendants. TO APPOINT COUNSEL

15 (ECF NO. 14)

16 AND

17 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS THIS ACTION FOR FAILURE

18 TO STATE A CLAIM WITHOUT LEAVE

TO AMEND

19 (ECF Nos. 1, 18) 20

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

21 THIRTY DAYS

22 Plaintiff Joe S. Dejesus is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 23 this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For reasons stated below, the Court 24 vacates its previous Findings and Recommendations, denies Plaintiff’s motion to appoint 25 counsel, and recommends that this case be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim 26 without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.