Ndoh

(PC) Urmancheev v. Ndoh

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 17, 20241:21-cv-00255California381 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALIM S. URMANCHEEV, No. 1:21-cv-00255 JLT HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE

v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

CLAIM, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF

R. NDOH, et al., COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE Defendants. (Doc. 22) 16 Alim S. Urmancheev is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The assigned magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, and found Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim. Because the Court previously provided the applicable standards and Plaintiff failed to cure the pleading deficiencies, the magistrate judge found further leave to amend would be futile and recommended the case be dismissed. (Doc. 22.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff and notified him that any objections were due within 14 days. (Doc. 22…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.