(PS) Alston v. City of Sacramento

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERIC ANTHONY ALSTON, JR., No. 2:21-cv-02049 DAD AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the order granting 19 summary judgment in defendants’ favor. ECF No. 43. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, and 20 accordingly this motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). The 21 court construes plaintiff’s request as a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Federal Rule 22 of Civil Procedure 60. For the reasons that follow, plaintiff’s request should be DENIED. 23 I. RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY 24 Plaintiff filed his civil rights complaint on November 5, 2021, presenting eight claims 25 arising from the police response to a home in the Meadowview area of Sacramento on October 6, 26 2021. ECF No. 1. The case was litigated through defendants’ motion for summary judgment, 27 …