(PS) Alston v. City of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC ANTHONY ALSTON, JR., No. 2:21-cv-02049 DAD AC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the order granting summary judgment in defendants’ favor. ECF No. 43. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, and accordingly this motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). The court construes plaintiff’s request as a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60. For the reasons that follow, plaintiff’s request should be DENIED. I. RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff filed his civil rights complaint on November 5, 2021, presenting eight claims arising from the police response to a home in the Meadowview area of Sacramento on October 6, 2021. ECF No. 1. The case was litigated through defendants’ motion for summary judgment, 27 …