Trate

(HC) Roman v. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 17, 20241:23-cv-01411California474 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JUSTIN ROMAN, No. 1:23-cv-01411-JLT-SKO (HC) 11 Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

12 v. (Doc. 14)

13 ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S

B.M. TRATE, MOTION TO DISMISS, DISMISSING

14 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS Respondent. CORPUS AND DIRECTING CLERK OF 15 COURT TO ENTER JUDGMENT AND

CLOSE CASE

16 [NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS 17 REQUIRED]

18 19 Justin Roman is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition 20 for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This matter was referred to a United 21 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 22 On March 4, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations 23 to grant Respondent’s motion to dismiss. (Docs. 11, 14.) The Court served the Findings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.