Huynh
Huynh v. Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TRUCMAI HUYNH, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-000157-KES-EPG Plaintiffs, v. ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
ON REQUEST TO STAY DISCOVERY;
ALLSTATE NORTHBROOK CLARIFYING MINUTE ORDER
INDEMNITY COMPANY,
(ECF Nos. 18, 19) Defendant.
16 This removed case alleges claims for breach of contract and breach of the implied 17 covenant of good faith and fair dealing stemming from an insurance dispute. (ECF No. 1). Now 18 before the Court is Defendant’s ex parte application to stay discovery and for Court clarification. 19 (ECF No. 18). 20 Motion to Stay Discovery First, Defendant moves to stay all discovery pending a ruling on its motion to compel arbitration.1 To the extent that Defendant’s ex parte application requests a ruling without giving Plaintiffs the opportunity to respond and to the extent that it requests an expedited ruling, Defendant has failed to provide a sufficient basis to grant such relief. See Mission…