Leckie

(PC) Hulbert v. Leckie

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20242:22-cv-00082California2,683 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARREN SCOTT HULBERT, No. 2:22-cv-00082 AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER F. LECKIE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints As plaintiff was previously informed, the court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against “a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are “frivolous, malicious, or fail[] to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” or that “seek[] monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). A claim “is [legally] frivolous where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.” Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); Franklin v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.