(PS) Roberts v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SYDNEY BROOKE ROBERTS and No. 2:22-cv-01699 DJC AC PS
DAVID TYRONE SAMUEL,
12 Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v.
SACRAMENTO HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action pro se, and the matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(21). The operative complaint is the Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 11), filed November 15, 2022. See ECF No. 36. Portions of this complaint have been dismissed, while others remain. Id. The undersigned has identified two remaining problems with the status of some of the parties in this case. A. The Minor Children Must be Removed as Plaintiffs The operative complaint identifies four plaintiffs: David Tyrone Samuel, Sydney Brooke Roberts, and two minor children: “AIMS” and “DAYS.” ECF No. 36 at 9. Although the initial screening order in this case informed the adult plaintiffs that as pro se plaintiffs, they can 27 …