Allison

(HC) Weisner v. Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20242:23-cv-00662California454 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANKIE WEISNER, No. 2:23-cv-0662 DAD AC P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS KATHLEEN ALLISON, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 23, 2023, respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition. ECF No. 14. After petitioner twice failed to respond to the motion, the undersigned recommended that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 20. Petitioner then filed a motion for an extension of time to respond to the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 22) and the findings and recommendations were withdrawn (ECF No. 23). Because it was unclear if petitioner had received a copy of the motion to dismiss, respondent was ordered to re-serve the motion and petitioner was given thirty days to respond. Id. Respondent re-served the motion on January 23, 2024. ECF No. 24. After petitioner once again failed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.