Manzanarez
Manzanarez v. Madera Collection Services
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROSENDO MANZANAREZ, individually Case No. 1:23-cv-00258-JLT-BAM and on behalf of others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S v. COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE 14 PURSUANT TO RULE 41(b) AND
MADERA COLLECTION SERVICES, DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S CLASS
15 WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendant. 16 (Docs. 1, 22) 17 18 The Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint for failure to establish Article III standing. 19 (Doc. 22.) The Court granted Plaintiff 21 days to amend his complaint to show a concrete and 20 particularized injury. (Id. at 8–9.) Plaintiff has failed to do so. 21 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) allows the Court to dismiss an action if the plaintiff 22 fails to comply with a court order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).1 “By its plain text, a Rule 41(b) 23 dismissal . . . requires a court order with which an offending plaintiff failed to comply.” Applied 24 …