Jones
(PC) Mills v. Jones
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS K. MILLS, No. 1:23-cv-01214-JLT-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
REGARDING EXHAUSTION OF
13 v. ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES AS
UNNECESSARY
14 ZACHERY JONES, et al. (ECF No. 52) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s request to “enter a motion to prove my exhaustion 20 of my administra[tive] remedies,” filed April 17, 2024. Plaintiff’s motion shall be denied. 21 I. 22 DISCUSSION 23 The Prison Litigation Reform Act provides that “[n]o action shall be brought with respect 24 to prison conditions under [42 U.S.C. § 1983], or any other Federal law, by a prisoner confined in 25 any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available 26 are exhausted.” 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Exhaustion of…