Jones

(PC) Mills v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20241:23-cv-01214California541 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS K. MILLS, No. 1:23-cv-01214-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

REGARDING EXHAUSTION OF

v. ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES AS

UNNECESSARY

ZACHERY JONES, et al. (ECF No. 52) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s request to “enter a motion to prove my exhaustion of my administra[tive] remedies,” filed April 17, 2024. Plaintiff’s motion shall be denied. I. DISCUSSION The Prison Litigation Reform Act provides that “[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under [42 U.S.C. § 1983], or any other Federal law, by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.” 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Exhaustion of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.