Jones

(PC) Mills v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20241:23-cv-01214California541 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS K. MILLS, No. 1:23-cv-01214-JLT-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

REGARDING EXHAUSTION OF

13 v. ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES AS

UNNECESSARY

14 ZACHERY JONES, et al. (ECF No. 52) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s request to “enter a motion to prove my exhaustion 20 of my administra[tive] remedies,” filed April 17, 2024. Plaintiff’s motion shall be denied. 21 I. 22 DISCUSSION 23 The Prison Litigation Reform Act provides that “[n]o action shall be brought with respect 24 to prison conditions under [42 U.S.C. § 1983], or any other Federal law, by a prisoner confined in 25 any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available 26 are exhausted.” 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Exhaustion of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.