Brinton
(PC) Saenz v. Brinton
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT G. SAENZ, No. 1:23-cv-01303-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR A STAY PENDING OUTCOME OF HIS
v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS
CORPUS
BRINTON, et al., (ECF No. 27) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Robert G. Saenz (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 29, 2024, the undersigned screened the first amended complaint and issued findings and recommendations that this action be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted. (ECF No. 22.) Following an extension of time, Plaintiff timely filed objections on April 3, 2024. (ECF No. 26.) In his objections, Plaintiff concedes that this action is barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 482 (1994), but that he has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus together with his objections to the findings and 25 …