Brinton

(PC) Saenz v. Brinton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20241:23-cv-01303California581 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT G. SAENZ, No. 1:23-cv-01303-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR A STAY PENDING OUTCOME OF HIS

v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS

BRINTON, et al., (ECF No. 27) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Robert G. Saenz (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 29, 2024, the undersigned screened the first amended complaint and issued findings and recommendations that this action be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted. (ECF No. 22.) Following an extension of time, Plaintiff timely filed objections on April 3, 2024. (ECF No. 26.) In his objections, Plaintiff concedes that this action is barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 482 (1994), but that he has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus together with his objections to the findings and 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.