Torres

Torres v. Khaira

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20241:24-cv-00155California2,666 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD TORRES, Case No. 1:24-cv-00155-SAB 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12 RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION v. FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM; 13 FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND COMPLY

JASPREET SINGH KHAIRA, WITH A COURT ORDER

14 Defendants. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE 15 COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A

DISTRICT JUDGE

16 (ECF Nos. 1, 10) 17

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY

18 DAYS 19 I. 20 INTRODUCTION 21 Plaintiff Edward Torres (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, initiated this civil rights action 22 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on February 2, 2024, against Jaspreet Singh Khaira (“Defendant”). 23 (ECF No. 1.) An order issued on March 11, 2024, providing Plaintiff with thirty days in which to 24 file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 10.) In the March 11, 2024 order, Plaintiff was advised 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.