Soto

(PC) Vega v. Soto

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20241:22-cv-00471California1,666 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 FRANCISCO VEGA, JR., 1:22-cv-000471-JLT-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.

ORDER SETTING DEADLINE TO FILE

M. SOTO, et al., SUPPORTING BRIEF Defendants. (ECF No. 105). 14

Plaintiff Francisco Vega, Jr., is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights 16 action. Generally, Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that, after he filed grievances about the 17 Defendants’ misconduct, including an incident during which his testicles were squeezed, 18 Defendants retaliated against him by filing a Rules Violation Report (RVR) falsely accusing him 19 of constructive possession of a cellular phone. (ECF No. 15). This case proceeds on Plaintiff’s 20 First Amendment retaliation claims against Defendants Soto, Noujaime, and Borba. (Id.). 21 This matter is before the Court on documents that Defendants have provided to the Court 22 for in camera review. Upon review of the documents submitted, the Court will (1) order Defendants to show cause why sanctions should not issue for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.