Marsh

Marsh v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20241:23-cv-01451California798 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5

6 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 11 TERRANCE MARSH, et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-01451-JLT-EPG 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER REGARDING UNSERVED CASE

DOCUMENTS; EXTENDING DEADLINE

13 v. TO SERVE DEFENDANT 14 FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION, (ECF No. 14)

15 Defendant. 16

17 Plaintiffs Terrance Marsh and Gesele Marsh proceed pro se and in forma pauperis in this 18 civil action. (ECF Nos. 1, 7, 9). On January 25, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiffs’ first amended 19 complaint, and concluded that they stated a claim against Defendant Freedom Mortgage 20 Corporation under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. (ECF No. 10). 21 The Court directed Plaintiffs to complete and return service documents (ECF No. 11) to 22 serve Defendant, which Plaintiffs did (ECF No. 12), and on February 6, 2024, the Court directed 23 the United States Marshals Service to serve the documents on Defendant. (ECF No. 13). On April 24 16, 2024, the United States Marshals Service filed the process receipt and return showing that 25 Defendant was not served because it was unable to locate the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.