Cano
(HC) KasenzangaKhona v. Cano
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHAKAZULU KASENZANGAKHONA, Case No. 1:24-cv-00358 JLT SKO (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE
13 v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS
CORPUS, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK
14 OF COURT TO ENTER JUDGMENT AND
CLOSE CASE
15 L. CANO, et al., (Doc. 5)
16 Respondents. ORDER DECLINING TO ISSUE
CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
17 18 Shakazulu Kasenzangakhona is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 19 with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The assigned magistrate 20 judge found the petition was unexhausted, because Petitioner “has not presented his claims to the 21 California courts.” (Doc. 5 at 4.) In addition, the magistrate judge observed that Petitioner “does 22 not challenge his conviction,” but rather “challenges the conditions of his confinement and seeks 23 a transfer between facilities.” (Id.) Therefore, the magistrate judge…