Cano

(HC) KasenzangaKhona v. Cano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20241:24-cv-00358California1,262 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHAKAZULU KASENZANGAKHONA, Case No. 1:24-cv-00358 JLT SKO (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE

13 v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK

14 OF COURT TO ENTER JUDGMENT AND

CLOSE CASE

15 L. CANO, et al., (Doc. 5)

16 Respondents. ORDER DECLINING TO ISSUE

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

17 18 Shakazulu Kasenzangakhona is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 19 with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The assigned magistrate 20 judge found the petition was unexhausted, because Petitioner “has not presented his claims to the 21 California courts.” (Doc. 5 at 4.) In addition, the magistrate judge observed that Petitioner “does 22 not challenge his conviction,” but rather “challenges the conditions of his confinement and seeks 23 a transfer between facilities.” (Id.) Therefore, the magistrate judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.