Escobar

(PC) Quintana v. Escobar

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20241:24-cv-00258California404 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JOHNNY QUINTANA, 1:24-cv-00258-EPG (PC)

10 Plaintiff,

ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

11 v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

12 D. ESCOBAR, et al., RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE

13 Defendants. 14 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS

15

16 Plaintiff Johnny Quintana is a prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights lawsuit filed 17 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After Plaintiff failed to submit an application to proceed in forma 18 pauperis or pay the filing fee, the Court issued an order on March 4, 2024, giving Plaintiff forty- 19 five days to do either and warning of dismissal if Plaintiff failed to comply. (ECF No. 4). The 20 forty-five-day period has expired, and Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee, submit an IFP 21 application, or otherwise respond to the Court’s order. 22 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall assign a district judge to this 23 case. 24 And IT IS…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.