Vang

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PATRICIA BELLOWS, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00300-KES-CDB 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

13 v. DEFENDANTS

14 K. VANG, et al., 14-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE

15 Defendants.

16 17 Plaintiff Patricia Bellows is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND 20 On March 4, 2024, the Court issued its Second Screening Order. (Doc. 14.) This Court 21 found Plaintiff’s first amended complaint plausibly alleges Eighth Amendment failure to protect 22 claims against Defendants Villaboas and Voguel, as well as an Eighth Amendment deliberate 23 indifference to serious medical needs claim against Defendant McClain but fails to allege any 24 other cognizable claim against any other named Defendant. (Id. at 5-14.) As a result, Plaintiff was 25 ordered to do one of the following within 21 days of the date of service of the order: (1) notify…