Courtesy Automotive Group, Inc. v. Subaru of America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20242:22-cv-00997California1,211 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 COURTESY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC., No. 2:22-cv-00997 WBS DMC dba COURTESY SUBARU OF CHICO, 13 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS v. 15 SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC. and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendant.

SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.,

19 Counterclaimant, 20 v.

COURTESY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC.,

dba COURTESY SUBARU OF CHICO,

Counterdefendant.

24 ----oo0oo---- Counterclaimant Subaru of America, Inc. (“Subaru”) asserts two counterclaims against counterdefendant Courtesy Automotive Group, Inc. (“Courtesy”): breach of contract (Counterclaim 1), and declaratory relief (Counterclaim 2). (See Countercl. (Docket 35-1).) Courtesy now moves to dismiss the counterclaims. (See Mot. (Docket No. 36).) I. Factual and Procedural Background The generally relevant procedural history is set forth in the court’s prior order resolving Subaru’s motion to dismiss Courtesy’s First…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.