Courtesy Automotive Group, Inc. v. Subaru of America, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 COURTESY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC., No. 2:22-cv-00997 WBS DMC dba COURTESY SUBARU OF CHICO, 13 Plaintiff, 14 ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS v. 15 SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC. and DOES 16 1-50, inclusive, 17 Defendant. 18
SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.,
19 Counterclaimant, 20 v. 21
COURTESY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC.,
22 dba COURTESY SUBARU OF CHICO,
23 Counterdefendant.
24 25 ----oo0oo---- 26 Counterclaimant Subaru of America, Inc. (“Subaru”) 27 asserts two counterclaims against counterdefendant Courtesy 28 Automotive Group, Inc. (“Courtesy”): breach of contract 1 (Counterclaim 1), and declaratory relief (Counterclaim 2). (See 2 Countercl. (Docket 35-1).) Courtesy now moves to dismiss the 3 counterclaims. (See Mot. (Docket No. 36).) 4 I. Factual and Procedural Background 5 The generally relevant procedural history is set forth 6 in the court’s prior order resolving Subaru’s motion to dismiss 7 Courtesy’s First…