Jaddou

(PS) Al Bayati v. Jaddou

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20242:23-cv-00688California818 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MUSTAFA YOUSIF AL BAYATI, No. 2:23-cv-0688 DAD DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 UR MENDOZA JADDOU; TERRI

ROBINSON,

15 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Mustafa Yousif Al Bayati is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was 19 referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 On April 13, 2023, plaintiff commenced this immigration action by filing a complaint and paying 21 the applicable filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) That same day plaintiff was served with a letter advising 22 plaintiff that Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure “provides that if a defendant is not 23 served within 90 days after service is order the court must dismiss the defendant without 24 prejudice.” (ECF No. 3 at 1.) However, no defendant appeared in this action. 25 Accordingly, on November 27, 2023, the undersigned issued an order to show cause, 26 ordering plaintiff to show cause in writing within…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.