Scott
Scott v. Adventist Health Bakersfield
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FLOYD SCOTT, Case No.: 1:22-cv-01334-KES-CDB 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DISMISS THIS ACTION FOR PLAINTIFF’S
13 v. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON
WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED
14 ADVENTIST HEALTH BAKERSFIELD, et al., (Doc. 10) 15 Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE 16
17
18 Plaintiff Floyd Scott is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 I. INTRODUCTION 21 Plaintiff filed his original complaint on October 19, 2022. (Doc. 1.) 22 On November 29, 2022, the Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 4.) On 23 December 14, 2022, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. (Doc. 7.) 24 Following issuance of this Court’s Second Screening Order on February 15, 2024 (Doc. 25 9), Plaintiff filed his second amended complaint on March 1, 2024 (Doc. 10). 26 II. SCREENING REQUIREMENT 27 The Court is required to screen complaints brought…