(PC) Maldonado v. Mule Creek State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20242:23-cv-02008California308 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLY RAY SHANEE MALDONADO, No. 2:23-cv-02008 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

MULE CREEK STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants. 16 By an order filed March 5, 2024 (ECF No. 5), plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the required fees in the amount of $405.00. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed the required documents. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.